Commentary

No Safe Level of Alcohol Consumption: Another Compelling and Robust Confirmation

Even a little alcohol is harmful to your health, major study reveals.

An important article on alcohol use was published on August 23, 2018 in The Lancet, a leading, prestigious scientific journal based in the UK. This landmark study integrates and appears to do some new data analysis on 694 data sources collected over a 26-year period from 195 locations around the globe. 

This is the first global integrated metadata analysis that we have seen on alcohol use. The methodology is strong, and researchers improved the analysis others had done when they could use original data.Their conclusions are ground breaking and should be definitive in world health. 

“Consuming zero standard drinks daily minimizes the overall risk to health,” a groundbreaking study says. 

Among the major findings are:

  • Alcohol is a major factor in global mortality and disease burden and the highest risk factor for those aged 19-45.
  • All-cause mortality was associated with any level of alcohol use.
  • Risk of many types of cancers increased with any level of alcohol use.
  • The authors confirmed that there was no safe level of alcohol use. The level of alcohol intake that most reduces mortality risks is zero intake.
  • The chart on page 11 of the article clearly shows that even half a glass of alcohol beverage a day has a measurable impact on increased mortality.
  • Any cardiac health benefits from low-level alcohol use is far outweighed by increased cancer risks and many specific types of cardiac risks.
  • The authors note, “These results suggest that alcohol control policies might need to be revised worldwide, refocusing on efforts to lower overall population-level consumption.”This has huge implications for policy and public health approaches that must be changed despite the vested interests of the massively profitable and influential alcohol industry.

This study confirms that for more than 150 years, the Adventist health message does a great deal to enhance quality and length of life.

We sometimes persist in trawling the shark-infested waters of the definite evidence showing the dangers of alcohol use in search of one sardine’s worth of positive, healthful evidence in favor of alcohol use.

The number of voices in the scientific literature raising questions and caution regarding the widespread perception that moderate alcohol use is beneficial to health has achieved robust credibility. Although many papers and studies support the cardio-protective effect of alcohol (moderate drinking), this hypothesis is by no means definitive. Marchand et al emphasize the many problems of studies of alcohol use, include confounding; risk of abuse and dependence; methodological issues related to assessing dosing; level and duration of use over the life course; and non-representativeness of study populations in reaching this conclusion.1

There is also great concern about the diversity that exists among nondrinkers. Nondrinkers represent a very diverse group, adding to the confounding, and variation in this group needs to be studied. This latest meta-analysis of global data published in The Lancet confirms other commentaries on the limitations of the evidence for a beneficial effect for moderate alcohol consumption, concluding, “The evidence for the harmful effects of alcohol is undoubtedly stronger than the evidence for beneficial effects.”2

In Summary

  • Alcohol is a widely used commodity.
  • It is the world’s third largest risk factor for disease burden.
  • Alcohol use places a burden on families, including a strong association with domestic violence.
  • Alcohol use can be addictive.
  • Alcohol use exacts high costs from society through associated crime and violence.
  • Moderate alcohol use is reported in the literature to have a cardio-protective quality, but the purported health benefits of moderate alcohol consumption are not applicable across age, ethnic, and gender variations.
  • Any apparent cardiac benefits are far outweighed by increases in cancer risks as well as specific types of cardiovascular risks such as strokes.
  • The most vulnerable for alcohol-use consequences are those aged 19 to 45 years; it is mandatory to get the facts to youth and younger adults.  
  • Moderate drinking is associated with many documented negative health, behavioral, and spiritual effects.
  • Alcohol is a known carcinogen, and no safe level of alcohol intake exists which is known that may avoid this dreaded health complication; it is now scientifically clear that the safe level of use is zero.

Conclusion

Taking into account the significant health risks related to alcohol use, there is no scientific basis for promoting its use for the sake of heart health. This is especially so when proven and safe interventions for heart disease prevention and rehabilitation are available, including exercise, a healthful diet, and non-addictive, tested medications where needed.

There is no scientific basis for promoting alcohol use for the sake of heart health, Adventist health leaders say.

We sometimes persist in trawling the shark-infested waters of the definite evidence showing the dangers of alcohol use in search of one sardine’s worth of positive, healthful evidence in favor of alcohol use. 

Certain lifestyle choices and measures offer protection against the problems alcohol inevitably brings in its wake: informed choices; exercise; rest; healthful eating; fresh air; sunshine; pure water (within and without); trust in God; social support; a good dose of optimism; and of course, temperance. 

By definition, temperance encourages us to use wisely those things that are healthful and good, and to dispense entirely with all things harmful. Temperance, lived through the enabling power of our gracious Lord Jesus Christ, serves as a foundation for a Spirit-filled experience that can celebrate life free from alcohol and its attendant ills.

So, should people who don’t drink alcohol start to use it? Based on the best scientificevidence, definitely not! Should those who currently drink alcohol quit? Based on the same evidence, unequivocally yes!

______________________________

1. Marchand, Alain, Andree Demers, Pierre Durand, and Marcel Simard, “The moderating effect of alcohol intake on the relationship between work strains and psychological distress.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol 64, no. 3 (2003), 419-427.

2. Fekjaer, Hans Olav. “Alcohol—a universal preventive agent? A critical analysis.” Addiction 108, no. 12 (December 2013), 2051-2057.

We reserve the right to approve and disapprove comments accordingly and will not be able to respond to inquiries regarding that. Please keep all comments respectful and courteous to authors and fellow readers.
comments powered by Disqus