Return to the Main Menu
F  E  A  T  U  R  E

Who's to Blame?

BY JAMES A. CRESS

This article is being jointly published in the November 2001 issue of Ministry magazine.

ho is responsible when towers topple? In tragedy's aftermath, we seek to explain the unexplainable. Unfortunately, even some clergy plunge into speaking without carefully studying the Word of God. Some have even declared that God uses tragic events to punish specific brands of sinners�liberals, homosexuals, civil libertarians, and abortionists. Such misguided individuals along with their dangerous pronouncements are wrong.

Scripture provides reliable answers: There were present at that season some who told Him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And Jesus answered and said to them, Do you suppose that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, because they suffered such things? I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish. Or those 18 on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish (Luke 13:1-5, NKJV).

Beware jumping to quick conclusions. Enquiring minds might leap to several conclusions, only one of which is biblically valid for New York City.

Sometimes towers fall. Even solid-appearing buildings might disguise engineering defects which collapse the whole building. This seems to be the case when the tower of Siloam fell and killed 18. Insurance policies call random tragedies acts of God when structural insufficiency may be to blame. Clearly this is not what happened at the World Trade Center. This was not the consequence of shoddy workmanship.

God's wrath targets certain brands of sinners. Equally erroneous is the conclusion that God is punishing certain sinners who are worse than others. Jesus allows nonesuch when He twice queries, "Do you suppose they were worse sinners than all other men?" Scripture provides no offensiveness scale defining categories of sinners. All sin is offensive to God's holiness. Just as God hates all sin, He loves every sinner.

As Myron Augsburger says, "Men are all alike sinners, but not sinners alike." Those who categorize some offenders as especially deserving of punishment misread the Bible. This false logic is so appealing because the first preacher to declare God's intent opportunistically defines the terms of debate.

Rush to Judgement
In rushing to pronounce God's wrath on your sin, I ignore His wrath on my own. I presumptiously compare my strengths with your weaknesses like the man who prayed, God, I thank You that I am not like other men. I even abuse prayer in self congratulation. However, contrast my faults with your strong points and I do not appear so pious.

An enemy hath done this. Did this tragedy come because some were worse than other sinners? Jesus says, "I tell you, No!"

Answering the question of ultimate responsibility for evil, Jesus says, the tares are the sons of the wicked one. The enemy who sowed them is the devil (Matt. 13:38b, 39). God does not use Satan's terrorist tactics. Jesus warns rebels of final consequence. "Unless you repent you will all likewise perish." But Scripture relentlessly affirms, "God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).

"To many minds the origin of sin and the reason for its existence are a source of great perplexity. They see the work of evil, with its terrible results of woe and desolation, and they question how all this can exist under the sovereignty of One who is infinite in wisdom, in power, and in love . . . It is impossible to explain the origin of sin so as to give a reason for its existence. Yet enough may be understood concerning both the origin and the final disposition of sin to make fully manifest the justice and benevolence of God in all His dealings with evil. Nothing is more plainly taught in Scripture than that God was in no wise responsible for the entrance of sin; that there was no arbitrary withdrawal of divine grace, no deficiency in the divine government, that gave occasion for the uprising of rebellion. Sin is an intruder, for whose presence no reason can be given. It is mysterious, unaccountable; to excuse it is to defend it. Could excuse for it be found, or cause be shown for its existence, it would cease to be sin. Our only definition of sin is that given in the word of God; it is the outworking of a principle at war with the great law of love which is the foundation of the divine government."

Rather than rushing to pronounce God's judgment, we would better proclaim His love so that whosoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

_________________________
1 Myron S. Augsburger, The Communicator's Commentary (Waco, Texas: Word Books, Publisher, 1982).
2 Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan (Nampa, Idaho: Pacific Press� Pub. Assn., 1888), 492, 493.

_________________________
James A. Cress serves as Ministerial Association Secretary for the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists.

Email to a Friend


ABOUT THE REVIEW
INSIDE THIS WEEK
WHAT'S UPCOMING
GET PAST ISSUES
LATE-BREAKING NEWS
OUR PARTNERS
SUBSCRIBE ONLINE
CONTACT US
SITE INDEX

HANDY RESOURCES
LOCATE A CHURCH
SUNSET CALENDER

FREE NEWSLETTER



Exclude PDF Files

Email to a Friend

LATE-BREAKING NEWS | INSIDE THIS WEEK | WHAT'S UPCOMING | GET PAST ISSUES
ABOUT THE REVIEW | OUR PARTNERS | SUBSCRIBE ONLINE
CONTACT US | INDEX | LOCATE A CHURCH | SUNSET CALENDAR

© 2000, Adventist Review.