Return to the Main Menu
C U R R E N T     I S S U E S

BY RICHARD OSBORN

e wrestle in our personal lives with knowing and understanding God’s will for us. But an even more difficult challenge confronts us in a body of believers: How to find God’s will in the decisions we make in groups.

The Seventh-day Adventist Church at all levels conducts most of its business through committees, boards, constituency meetings, and every five years, at a worldwide General Conference quinquennial session such as the one just concluded in Toronto, Canada. Have you ever wondered how God can help a group of people from diverse backgrounds, with differing interests and needs, find the divine will in our group decisions? Believers today don’t have a cloud and fiery pillar, a Urim and Thummim, a rainbow, a fleece, a Most Holy Place, Old Testament prophets, or even a modern-day prophet such as Ellen White receiving visions.

To be honest, I have experienced moments of cynicism about how God really works through church meetings. Members come together, each person holding preconceived ideas, and sometimes not the ideas I agree with. We have an opening prayer, special music, and a devotion. We listen to reports, recommendations, and then have heated debate. Often just before a controversial vote, someone will get up and say that we should pray before we vote. We spend a long time in small groups praying, and it seems that everyone votes exactly the same way as they intended before they even came to the meeting. It’s almost as if we’re asking the Lord to bless the decision we have already individually made in advance!

From the pages of Adventist history, we find a story that highlights important principles concerning how God works through our processes.1

The year? 1900.

The place? Australia.

The person? A 73-year-old fragile American woman who doesn’t want to leave the warm country she has called home for nine years.

So why leave? Because the Lord impresses her that she must return home with her son and secretary to give direction to a church she helped found now floundering in controversy. She must attend a General Conference session planned for Battle Creek in the dead of winter—February 1901. Ellen White packs her bags for the three-week-long 7,000-mile voyage home on the boat. The drinking, smoking, and dancing on the boat keep her awake every night to the point that she prays for a storm on the final night of partying before the boat docks. Such a large storm comes up as they approach San Francisco that neither she nor any of the passengers can get out of bed.

She wonders how the upcoming session can find God’s will while so many major problems abound: the location of too many institutions in Battle Creek; a structure that doesn’t meet the needs of the growing church; her concerns that the General Conference is dominating local conferences; John Harvey Kellogg’s growing power; and the authoritarian attitudes of too many church leaders.2

She wishes the meeting would be held in Oakland, California, near St. Helena, where she has settled after returning from Australia. Having been through two back-to-back winters, her very poor health makes her reluctant to travel to Michigan in the dead of winter. But she decides it is more important to save the extra $6,000 to $8,000 it would cost to have the meeting nearby for her convenience. She views the 1901 General Conference session as vitally important.

The trip starts badly when she loses consciousness for 12 hours in Los Angeles after preaching. Today we would probably put such an elderly frail person in intensive care for several days, but within two days she’s on her way. By train she travels to Vicksburg, Mississippi, where she spends time with her son, Edson White, visiting with him on the Morning Star, the steamboat ministry reaching former slaves in the South. Then it’s on to Memphis, Nashville, and finally Chicago, where she preaches to 650 people and gets a firsthand view of the medical missionary work started by John Harvey Kellogg. Her arrival in Battle Creek after a 10-year absence must be bittersweet: her husband, James, and two sons are buried there. She stays with John Harvey Kellogg, the man she mentored as a young boy.

Delegates have come from all over the world for this meeting. How could she help a group of independent-minded church members find God’s will as a unified body?

Shortly after Ellen White arrives in Battle Creek in March 1901, she is urged to begin speaking in public, even though she is tired and weak from strenuous travel. Every night Kellogg has a nurse give her a treatment to help in the recovery process.

On March 28 she preaches to a publishers’ convention just days before the General Conference session begins, speaking extemporaneously.3 She’s already thinking and praying about the important session scheduled to begin in a few days. After leaving Australia and coming so far for such an important meeting, she identifies six basic principles that can help find God’s will in group decision-making—counsel that will help us nearly a century later as well.

She preached, “Unless we are close to our Saviour, unless His power and grace are with us individually, we may be sure that we shall go from this place thinking that we have not had a very wonderful meeting.” The other possibility? “We can make a heaven here during this meeting. . . . Or a hell . . . just as we choose.” If any had come unprepared to meet with God, they should begin the meeting by humbling their hearts before God and putting “away everything that interposes between our souls and Him. . . . He wants us to do a great deal more praying and a great deal less talking. . . . God will let this light shine into the heart of everyone who at this meeting will stand in right relation to Him.”

Could too much group prayer be a bad thing? Some had suggested they ought to spend several days in prayer for the Holy Spirit to descend on believers, as at Pentecost. Doesn’t that sound like a good idea? Not to Ellen White.

“I wish to say to you that the business which may be carried on at this meeting is to be just as much a part of the service of God as is prayer. The business meeting is to be just as much under the direction of the Spirit as the prayer meeting.”

So the committee meetings we conduct are to be just as much of God’s service as a prayer meeting? Richard Foster writes that “business meetings should be viewed as worship services.”4 This prayer principle for group meetings doesn’t negate the need for more personal prayer found in principle 1.

Why was she worried about too many days of prayer seeking the Holy Spirit?

“There is danger of our getting a sentimental, impulsive religion. Let the business transacted at this meeting stand forth in such sacredness that the heavenly host can approve it.”

In other words, she favored a businesslike, sacred atmosphere in church business meetings.

Her sermon continued, “God wants you to stand in a position where He can breathe upon you the Holy Spirit, where Christ can abide in the heart. He wants you at the beginning of this meeting to lay off whatever of controversy, of strife, of dissension, of murmuring, you have been carrying. . . . Remember that you will make the meeting what it is. . . . Talk with God, and He will be with you.”

Her language grew stronger in frustration: “And if you do not draw from heaven power and grace and treasures of truth to give to the people, then, for Christ’s sake, stop your work till you realize the importance of a close union with God.”

“He is knocking, knocking at your heart. Open the door and let Him in. Empty the heart of all selfishness, by living right, eating right, thinking right. Enthrone the Saviour in the heart. . . . May the Lord help us to take steps heavenward.”

Was God’s will accomplished at the 1901 General Conference session? Ellen White expressed her astonishment at what had happened. Her earlier concerns about “one man or the minds of a few men”5 exerting “kingly power”6 didn’t materialize. In what may have been the most significant General Conference session in the history of the denomination, these things happened:
  • Union conferences were organized as regional units, helping to disperse the power of just a few leaders at the General Conference.
  • Representation on the General Conference committee was broadened from a handful of men to 25 members representing all aspects of the church’s work.
  • Church departments began to be formulated.
  • The payment of Bible teachers from tithe and the need for establishing church schools were voted for the first time.
  • Young people’s societies were organized.
  • The prophet believed the God of heaven and His angels had “walked up and down the aisles”7 of the Battle Creek Tabernacle to give the delegates “right and peaceable minds.”8 She admitted that advance instruction had been given to her, but “until the sum was worked out at this meeting, I could not comprehend this instruction.”9 Not even she understood the implications of the messages given her, but by the group working together, God’s will had been found.

    Sometimes we wish today that Ellen White could be present to give us advice on how to proceed at a difficult moment. But isn’t it interesting that when she was ministering she often just provided general principles—which we still have available today?

    She admonished the delegation, “Press together, press together.”10 We find this same principle in Proverbs 11:14: “Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.” In Matthew 18:20 we read, “For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them” (NKJV).

    As Adventists meet together in groups, trying to discover God’s will, let’s always remember to press together once the decision has been made. In the history of our church, each time a challenge came, God gave church members meeting in groups the insight, the determination, and the courage to find solutions that could only have been divinely inspired.

    Novelist Lloyd Douglas tells how, as a university student, he lived in a boarding house where a retired music teacher was confined to a wheelchair and unable to leave his first-floor apartment. Every morning Douglas would engage in a ritual by which he would walk down the stairs, open the teacher’s door, and ask, “Well, what’s the good news?”

    The man would pick up his old tuning fork, tap it on his wheelchair, think about the very middle note on a piano (“middle C”), and say, “That’s middle C! It was middle C yesterday, it will be middle C tomorrow, it will be middle C a thousand years from now. The tenor upstairs sings flat, the piano across the hall is out of tune, but, my friend, that is middle C!”

    Donald McCullough says of this story, “The old man had discovered a constant reality on which he could depend, an unchanging truth to which he could cling.

    “Jesus Christ is our tuning fork, ringing out middle C in a cacophonous world of competing truths; his pitch defines tonal reality and sets every other note in its proper place. . . . When we listen to middle C two things happen: the revelation of Jesus Christ both separates us from God and unites us to God.”11

    A college classmate of mine, David Lamoreaux, tunes pianos. When I watch him tune a piano, it takes three strings in the upper register for each note to be perfectly and individually tuned.

    When we meet as church members in groups, we need to find the perfectly tuned middle C of Jesus Christ in our lives. If we empty our lives of self-centeredness and open ourselves to God’s will, we can find middle C in our meetings. That doesn’t mean we will all be in agreement on every issue discussed. The debate may be vigorous and heated at times.

    But if we find middle C, we can leave a church meeting in harmony and peace. We’ll find that God speaks to us through the community of faith working together in love as the complementary parts of the body of Christ.

    ______________
     1 Arthur L. White, Ellen G. White Biography (Hagerstown, Md.: Review and Herald Pub. Assn., 1981), vol. 5, pp. 13-110.
     2 Barry David Oliver, Seventh-day Adventist Organizational Structure. Past, Present, and Future, Andrews University Doctoral Dissertation Series, Vol. XV, 1989, p. 125.
     3 Portions quoted in Ellen G. White, Selected Messages (Hagerstown, Md.: Review and Herald Pub. Assn., 1958), book 3, pp. 336, 337 and full text in Ellen White, Sermons and Talks, vol. 2 (Silver Spring, Md.: Ellen G. White Estate, 1994), pp. 151-155.
     4 Richard Foster, Celebration of Discipline: The Path to Spiritual Growth, rev. ed. (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988), p. 182.
     5 White, Ellen G. White Biography, vol. 5, p. 76.
     6 Ibid., p. 77
     7 Ibid., p. 110.
     8 Ibid.
     9 Ibid.
    10 Ibid.
    11 Donald W. McCullough, The Trivialization of God. The Dangerous Illusion of a Manageable Deity (Colorado Springs: Navpress, 1995), pp. 66, 67.

    _________________________
    Richard Osborn is vice president for education, North American Division of Seventh-day Adventists.

    Email to a Friend



    ABOUT THE REVIEW
    INSIDE THIS WEEK
    WHAT'S UPCOMING
    GET PAST ISSUES
    LATE-BREAKING NEWS
    OUR PARTNERS
    SUBSCRIBE ONLINE
    CONTACT US
    SITE INDEX

    HANDY RESOURCES
    LOCATE A CHURCH
    SUNSET CALENDER FREE NEWSLETTER

    LATE-BREAKING NEWS | INSIDE THIS WEEK | WHAT'S UPCOMING | GET PAST ISSUES
    ABOUT THE REVIEW | OUR PARTNERS | SUBSCRIBE ONLINE
    CONTACT US | INDEX | LOCATE A CHURCH | SUNSET CALENDAR

    © 2000, Adventist Review.