BY STEPHEN CHAVEZ
he war in Iraq and the instability in the Middle East have
been framed variously in terms of a conflict of democracy versus dictatorship,
freedom versus oppression, or East versus West. The issue underlying it all,
however, is that both sides have, at one time or another, defined it in terms
of a conflict between three of the world's great religionsChristianity,
Judaism, and Islam.

This has profound and frightening implications for a worldwide
church that seeks to serve people of "every nation, tribe, language and
people" (Rev. 14:6, NIV).
The most obvious implication is that in many Middle Eastern
countries the United States, a nominally Christian nation, is seen as an aggressor.
Those who fight against coalition forces in Iraq (for example) are viewed as
defenders of Islam and soldiers in the struggle against infidels. In these countries
association with a Christian church that has its headquarters in the United
States is not only imprudent; it's dangerous.
We're routinely treated to news reports of private contractors
and aid workers in Iraq kidnapped and executed because of their perceived association
with U.S. government institutions, contractors, or aid agencies. In many cases
fear and intimidation keep humanitarian suppliesfood, medicine, clothing,
etc.from the people whose lives depend on them.
Even in countries far less chaotic and violent than Iraq, religious
groupsBuddhists, Christians, Hindus, Muslims, etc.separate themselves
into enclaves and use various forms of armed violence and emotional intimidation
to terrorize minority members of other faiths.
Nationalism, militarism, and religious extremism are shaking
the foundations of many of the world's societies, and very little is being done
to stop the senseless and cyclical acts of violence between people of different
faith traditions. A worldwide church that operates openly in nearly every country
should do whatever it can to avoid attracting the attention of religious extremists.
1. The church should highlight its role as an indigenous
community of faith and avoid being identified as a United States-based denomination.
The gospel is not confined by geographical or philosophical boundaries.
Even though our world headquarters is located in the United States, every division,
every union, every conference, should be staffed predominantly by people who
are citizens of the local country. Church policies should be integrated into
the local culture, not patterned after those imported from the United States.
2. Beliefs enunciated by local members should be based on
the Bible alone and be interpreted locally, not through the eyes of North Americans.
Western customs regarding dress, music, and worship should be adopted with care.
Larger biblical principles of honesty, modesty, simplicity, and economy transcend
national borders. Adventists should strive to be model citizens in the way they
uphold heaven's principles.
3. Adventists in every country and culture should be cautious
about the political causes they endorse. Under no circumstances should Adventists
advocate the violent overthrow of any regime or government. Nor should they
engage in anything other than democratically sanctioned methods to influence
society. Christians influence society by their very presence; salt and light
cannot be ignored. But God's kingdom has never been advancedonly retardedby
people who take up arms or otherwise try to coerce others to abide by biblical
principles.
4. Adventists should dedicate themselves to breaking down
prejudice and stereotypes, not reinforcing them. The world's greatest needs
will not be addressed by fanatical adherence to religious orthodoxy, but by
a lifestyle of selfless service. Jesus' inclusive, nonjudgmental, sacrificial
ministry while on earth is a model for anyone attempting to solve some of the
problems of our world today. In the long run love, tolerance, and nonviolence
always trump hatred, bigotry, and violence.
The Bible clearly teaches that we Christians are citizens of
two kingdoms (Matt. 22:21; John 17:15-18; Rom. 13:1; Heb. 11:9, 10); we have
citizenship in heaven as well as on earth. Complications arise when these earthly
kingdoms fight against one another. While we may not be able to significantly
affect global affairs and reduce the severity or frequency of acts of hatred
and warfare, we can live individually, in our own small ways, the principles
of the Prince of Peace.