BY ANGEL MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Paul says in 2 Corinthians 12:2, 3 that he was not certain
whether he went to the third heaven “in the body” or “out of the body.” Is he
suggesting that his “spirit” could leave the body and visit other places?
t is useful, in answering your question, to take into consideration
the biblical teaching on human nature. The idea that humans are formed by two
entities, a soul/spirit plus a physical body that can exist separately from
each other (usually called dualism), is foreign to biblical thought. Any exemption
to that teaching must be clearly grounded on the context and linguistic analysis
of the passage.
Paul wrote: “I know a man . . . who . . . was caught up
to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not
know—God knows. And I know that this man—whether in the body or apart from the
body I do not know, but God knows—was caught up to paradise” (2 Cor. 12:2-4).*
1. Contextual Considerations: The topic in this passage
is clearly introduced in verse 1, namely, visions and revelations. He knows
a man (Paul himself) who was caught up to heaven. Notice that it was not his
spirit that was taken to Paradise, but the man himself. There is no dualism
in the text, and we should not introduce it into the passage unless there are
good reasons. Paul is simply stating that he does not have a clear understanding
of the nature of his supernatural experience.
2. Outside/Apart From or in the Body: This language
has led some to conclude that Paul believed the spirit could leave the body
for a period of time. The first phrase, “in the body,” is not problematic, since
it simply means that he was not sure whether during his vision or revelation
he was bodily taken to heaven, that is to say, whether he was in fact
there. The other option he presents is that he might have been there, not in
his actual physical body, but outside/apart from the body.
We should not introduce into the discussion the term spirit,
because Paul does not use it here. The phrase “outside the body” is employed
only once more by Paul, in 1 Corinthians 6:18, in the context of his discussion
on the nature of fornication: “All other sins a man commits are outside his
body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.” Certainly Paul
is not saying that sins are committed by a bodiless entity who resides inside
the body. The body is always involved in our sinning. Paul’s argument is that
there are sins in which the body is not involved in the trespass to the same
extent it is involved in the case of fornication. “Outside the body” does not
mean without the body but a condition in which the body is not as involved as
in other cases.
Paul is saying in 2 Corinthians 12 that he is not sure whether
during his supernatural experience he was physically taken to heaven or whether
he had a spiritual experience, a vision, during which the body was not as involved
as it would have been had he actually been taken to Paradise.
That same idea is expressed in verse 3, where instead of
“outside the body” Paul wrote “apart from the body.” His experience may
not have been connected to a physical translation to heaven; he may have been
there only in a visionary experience.
3. Biblical Antecedents: Our understanding of the
passage is confirmed by examining the ministry of other prophets who had experiences
similar to Paul’s. Philip baptized the Ethiopian, and then “the Spirit of the
Lord suddenly took Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him again” (Acts
8:39). Clearly the Spirit can physically transport a prophet to another place.
Sometimes the prophet was taken in a vision to a specific place to receive a
revelation from God. Ezekiel says that the Spirit, “in visions of God,” “took
me to Jerusalem” (Eze. 8:3). He was not physically there but only in a vision
(see Eze. 11:24). Paul states that he was not certain whether that was what
happened to him.
So the answer to your question is “No.”
*Scripture references are from the New International Version.
_________________________
Angel Manuel Rodríguez is an associate director of the Biblical
Research Institute of the General Conference.