|
BY GORDON
BIETZ
Not many
generations ago most people grew up in the town of their birth,
continued in the vocation of their parents, and rarely traveled more
than a few miles from their home. When they did travel, it was by
foot, by horse, or by donkey. Change for our ancestors meant one
season turning to another and day turning to night.
There was a time
when the most exciting thing to do on a Saturday night was to go to a
tent revival meeting; and the most anticipated activity of the week
was Wednesday evening prayer meeting. There was a time when people who
went to church looked pretty
much like you did. They liked the same music, they wore similar
clothes, and they thought pretty much alike.
Today our life span
will confront more changes than our ancestors experienced in a
thousand years. We have moved through the manufacturing age and the
information age to the digital age in one generation. We are
experiencing a tidal wave of change. The new millennium will not
provide cultural enclaves in which a Christian subculture can live out
its life in isolation from the influence of the world. We are now
faced with a world that puts every race, every idea, every religion,
every philosophy, and every worldview into our living rooms through
the Internet.
The Changing
Demographics
Take the United States, where I live. The U.S. Census Bureau says that
the non-Hispanic White population will fall below 50 percent in
California and Texas by 2025.1 "Perhaps the biggest demographic
story during the next 30 years will be the diversification of America.
Fully 73.7 percent of all Americans in 1995 were classified as
non-Hispanic Whites. But the Census Bureau predicts that only 62.4
percent of the nation's residents will fit that category in
2025."2
For too many church
members, identity comes not from being immersed in Scripture but from
being immersed in their culture. But the life of the church must
transcend cultural and ethnic divides. Our identity must come from our
Christian roots, not our social roots; from our relationship with
Christ and not from our relatives.
Leonard Sweet, in
his book SoulTsunami, says, "The Dick-and-Jane world of my '50s
childhood is over, washed away by a tsunami of change. . . . It has
created a sea change such as the world has never experienced before,
including a huge shift in religious sensibility. While the world is
rethinking its entire cultural formation, it is time to find new ways
of being the church that are true to our postmodern context. It is
time for a Postmodern Reformation."3
Predicting
Change
What will the future bring? Samuel Goldwyn said, "Never make
forecasts, especially about the future."4 Looking ahead 30 years
in a world that changes as rapidly as ours does is risky business. Who
would have predicted 30 years ago the rapid growth of the Internet and
the computer? Who would have been able to foresee the rise of
mega-churches that have thousands in attendance, such as the Willow
Creek Community Church outside Chicago?
We can cry
"The sky is falling" as we experience these changes; and we
can wring our hands pointing out all the bad things that come with the
changes. But remember that "God did not send his Son into the
world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him"
(John 3:17, NIV). Let us remember that the gospel is all about change,
the change of conversion.
The Descent Into
the New Dark
Ages
The church needs to recognize that this new millennium society is
growing ever more secular and nonreligious in its orientation. As the
title of a 1996 book by Robert Bork put it, we are "slouching
towards Gomorrah."5 This last century of the millennium has had
more "ethnic cleansing" than the world experienced during
the Dark Ages. We live at the end of Christian world dominance. The
world's fastest-growing religion today is Islam,6 and many communities
are dealing with a growing interest in witchcraft.
The church of the
next millennium is faced with very difficult issues that will test its
ability to sort truth from tradition. Adventism's deep involvement in
health and the medical work as the right arm of the message must not
be limited to fomentation, massage, and exercise. As genetic
engineering, cloning, and various creative ways to "grow
babies" are invented that give us unprecedented power over our
destiny, the church will need to have thoughtful answers that grow
from biblical principles.
The Church of
the Future
At least four major ingredients will characterize the church of
the future.
1. Balancing
change with conserving. The church must maintain balance between
adapting to the changes of the future and holding on to the past (see
Luke 5:37, 38, NRSV). We must not reflect modern culture in a vain
attempt to reach the culture. On the other hand, we must communicate
in a language that can be understood.
The preservation of
Scripture through the ages, the keeping of the faith, and the
conserving of truth are tasks given to a church that is to hold fast
to the landmarks. There is a great deal of security and continuity in
knowing that we "did not follow cleverly devised myths when we
made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but
we had been eyewitnesses of his majesty" (2
Peter 1:16, NRSV). We must never face the "cut-flower"
phenomena-looking beautiful and bright, but cut from our doctrinal
roots. Dead but not knowing it yet.
The church, then,
is to resist change and hold fast to the landmarks. Ellen White ran
into this problem in Minneapolis. The Holy Spirit was moving, and
people were resisting the leading of the Spirit, claiming that the new
light was abandoning the old landmarks.
"In
Minneapolis, God gave precious gems of truth to His people in new
settings. This light from heaven by some was rejected with all the
stubbornness the Jews manifested in rejecting Christ, and there was
much talk about standing by the old landmarks. But there was evidence
they knew not what the old landmarks were. . . . The minds of men were
fixed, sealed against the entrance of light, because they had decided
it was a dangerous error removing the 'old landmarks' when it was not
moving a peg of the old landmarks, but they had perverted ideas of
what constituted the old landmarks."7
Customs engraved in
the mind through many years of habitual behavior can become identified
with truth. Change the order of worship, move the pulpit, or paint the
mothers' room a different color, and you may hear some unusual
theological arguments.
The church will not
remain as it is. It is not possible. We will change as we always have
throughout our history. The only question is Will the change be a
planned, balanced change that will bring the gospel to bear on our
decisions, or will the force of events change us against our will?
Without thoughtful proactive change, the law of unintended
consequences will result in the church changing by following the
cultural road of least resistance.
2. Unity
in diversity. Today the Adventist Church is feeling centrifugal
forces of change. As the spin of theological, sociological, and
cultural differences pull us in different directions, we need an
underlying foundation to stand on so that we may fulfill the prayer of
Jesus that we all be one (John 17:21-23). That foundation needs to be
adequately broad to hold our diverse church and narrow enough to give
us identity. The temptation will be for those who seek uniformity
rather than unity to construct a narrow foundation that reflects their
culture and time and call it a doctrinal absolute. The church of the
new millennium must be a mature church that isn't threatened by
diversity and is open to multiple ways of representing our Lord in
this world.
Our church must not isolate itself
from the suffering in the
world.
Salvation did not
come to the Jews through their laws, and neither will it come to our
church by law. Seventh-day Adventism will not be held together by
developing a muscular Adventism, by a strengthening of the central
authority of the church, and developing a catechism, Talmud, or
expanded Church Manual. Unity is not produced by new rules but by a
revived mission. Unity is not brought about by new policies but by
renewed vision. Unity will not come because we have tinkered with the
structure of the church, but because we have a dream.
The glue that holds
us together in this very diverse world must be shared convictions on
the interpretation of Scripture, not a bureaucracy that seeks to
"hold the line" by policy adjustments and Church Manual
changes. Strengthening the tie that binds comes through thoughtful
discussion in an atmosphere of grace and acceptance, not through
dogmatic statements that vilify those who think differently. The
church at the beginning of a new millennium must have an atmosphere of
openness to discussion such as our church experienced at its
beginnings.
3. Vision.
There is power in vision. And for the church to survive, it needs to
dream again. Dream of how it can minister to the world by meeting its
spiritual and physical needs. Rotary International, a secular service
club, has embarked on a mission to rid the world of polio by 2005.
They have cast a vision of how they can make a difference in the
world, and they are making a measurable impact on the incidence of
polio in the world.
Certainly the
Adventist Church, with its human resources and its motivation, should
be able to cast a challenging vision that meets a real need in our
world. Let us portray a practical spirituality to the world, a
spirituality that casts a vision of meeting its spiritual and physical
needs. Our church must not isolate itself from the suffering in the
world. We are no longer able to live in isolated cocoons of security,
affirming one another as our health message extends our life spans,
while the life spans of people around the world collapse from ethnic
cleansing and disease. Let our doctrines delight and inspire the
hearers with their relevance to meeting human need.
4. Communities
of hope. May our spirituality be manifest not only in
contemplation but also in action! As we look to the new millennium may
our spirituality be counter cultural and community-building. It should
be open to uncertainty while at the same time confident of the gospel.
Our spirituality should be worn like a robe of righteousness and not
carried like a chip on the shoulder.
People today are in
need of hope. They desire a worldview that will give them confidence
to face a changing world and a community of people that will support
them in that world. People desire an understanding church that does
not simply preserve the faith of the fathers but energizes the faith
of the children. Under God, let us provide such a church for our world
in the new millennium.
1 The White
population is already below 50
percent in Hawaii, New Mexico, and the District of Columbia. Scott
Thomas, Demographics Journal, Monday, Dec. 9, 1996.
2 Ibid.
3 Leonard I. Sweet, SoulTsunami: Sink or Swim in New Millennium
Culture (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Pub. House, 1999), p. 17.
4 Ibid., p. 25.
5 Robert H. Bork, Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and
American Decline (New York: HarperCollins, 1996).
6 Sweet, p. 56.
7 Ellen G. White, Counsels to Writers and Editors (Hagerstown,
Md.: Review and Herald Pub. Assn., 1946), p. 30.
Gordon Bietz is
the president of Southern Adventist
University, Collegedale, Tennessee.
|